General

  1. Layered review (on title, abstract and full article)

    Make it possible to enter a layered review structure.
    Often researchers start with screening articles on title. The articles selected on title will be screened on abstract. And thereafter on full article.
    Now I have to make serveral reviews for 1 article

    61 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Randomly assign abstracts to collaborators for review

    It would be great to be able to randomly assign collaborators a percentage of the papers to review.

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Continue study selection from last stop on mobile app

    In the mobile app, whenever one does study selection and stop, the next time it starts from the first study and requires to scroll down to where the selection has to continue.

    This could be improved such that one can continue selection from the area where he/she lastly stopped. The app is quite handy and study selection could be done even during commuting.

    12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Allowing all collaborators to see user-created labels and exclusion reasons in Blind mode.

    While it is necessary to have the blind mode on during double screening (so that one reviewer's decision does not influence the other's decision), being able to designate labels or generate more specific exclusion criteria reasons (at least on the part of the review creator) that can be used by all reviewers would be extremely helpful. Labels allow designation of a subset of articles for intial screening, and exclusion reasons often need to be made more specific for the review at hand. This is true regardless of the need for Blind mode.

    8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Labeling system that can be made beforehand

    A labeling system that can be created together with a peer. If this is made beforehand it will be easier to use

    7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Option to select titles that are included/excluded by one reviewer

    To make the resolving of conflicts easier, it would be nice if we have an option to select the titles that a reviewer included/excluded. Discussing them and resolving them will be much easier.

    6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. easy way to go where you left off in rayyan app

    In de Rayyan app it would be nice if you can go immediately to where you left off, especially when you have a lot of references, now you have to scroll endless to get at ref 1400 eg (and still 600 to go). It would be great if you can jump to a number of your references

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Filter out

    Filter 'out' button. As in I can filter out a key word and see what entries remain.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Notes in PDF file

    Being able to make notes and mark text during full text screening on the pdf-file

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Set simlarity % for automatic duplicate deletion

    Would be fantastic if you could set the % function for duplicates to automatically delete all duplicates that are of a certain % match (e.g. automatically remove all duplicates that are 95% or greater similarity)

    5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Problemas com o aplicativo

    Preciso de auxílio urgente! Eu comecei a fazer a análise com o aplicativo e após as duplicatas sobraram 722 artigos, comecei a avaliar e depois apareceu que haviam apenas 221 artigos (os outros sumiram). Depois de alguns dias os outros 722 retornaram, mas depois de mais dias sumiram novamente e continua aparecendo apenas 221. Podem me ajudar?

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. undo

    Hello, what if I want to retrieve a reference (only one out of many) that I categorized as “not duplicate” instead of deleting it? Thanks in advance for your help!

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Reiniciar selección

    Poder reiniciar la selección de artículos. A veces pueden cambiar algunos criterios y esto requiere empezar de nuevo la revisión de los documentos.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Améliorer l'application sur téléphone

    Comme j'ai dit, trouver un moyen de descendre plus vite dans l'application sur téléphone. Si on a des milliers d'articles, ça fait trop long pour descendre. Il faudrait pouvoir écrire le numéro de l'article qu'on désire voir, ou quelque chose du genre.

    7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Search for Keyword by Title

    Allow us to search for keywords by title only. It would make exclusion go way faster at first. I noticed that I can do this in your mobile app, but not on the web app.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Grading study quality

    Generate automatically the final flowchart selection

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Lost colored view of in/excluded Words in app

    The owner ofreview added imams exclusion keywords which are very useful during screening at my laptop. However this is list when using the app, which prolongs screening using the app much longer. Or Did I miss something?

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. reasons & label history

    Keep a history of what labels & reasons have been added/removed to each reference and by who

    3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Add numbers to articles

    Add numbers to the articles so that people can collaborate on parts of the review.

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8
  • Don't see your idea?

General

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base