Move the "Review Chat" window away from the scrolling bar of the abstract view.

Improving the phone app so it does not have to download content after only a short amount of use would be useful. Or at least still being able to filter when this happens. Or maybe being able to sort in different ways.

Apologies if this function exists already but I have not found out how to do on the phone app

Make it possible to enter a layered review structure.
Often researchers start with screening articles on title. The articles selected on title will be screened on abstract. And thereafter on full article.
Now I have to make serveral reviews for 1 article

Make more than one "owner" on a review, or give all owner functions to additional collaborators, so that all settings and administration does not have to depend on the "owner". Particular helpful for example if the creator of the reviewer only works part-time, or needs help with finding specific settings.

There should be an ability to change/update the reason for exclusion. For eg: I had initially mentioned "case report" as an exclusion criteria. Now I want to update it to "Case report or case series"

Using keywords or labels to exclude (rather than include) abstracts when filtering

Load full list of titles and make it scrollable, do not refresh the list, this is quite annoying and causes me to loose track of the title list.

Make it possible to add comments to the different References that you include or exclude.

A count of total number of cumulative conflicts (and between which reviewers) throughout the whole review process, even after the conflicts have been resolved.

I am in a Systematic Review workshop, and we are looking at Rayyan along with some other tools. A concern from several participants is what would happen if QCRI stopped supporting Rayyan or if it was bought by Elsevier, etc.

Making Rayyan an open source prioject would help allay some of these concerns. The QCRI team could also benefit from community input.

It appears that authors with "and" somewhere in their name are formatted incorrectly.

Example from Rayyan:
Authors: , Br s, J. Garvey, G. Anderson, K. ...

The first author should be Brands, J. For some reason, Rayyan has disregarded the "and" misformatted the name - this is an issue when re-importing to EndNote.

If Gmail has got you trapped into any sort of problem such as it is not responding or if there is some issue with the sending and receiving process of the mail then for help and support over the issue connect with the experts at Gmail Support Number UK. At some points, it becomes problematic for the users to deal with the issues and errors without any help.

https://customerservicegmailuk.wordpress.com

Just like "undecided", there should also be "unlabelled" category

It will be a good idea to link the search summary with may be a unique ID or hyperlink which can be mentioned in the final manuscript (Like there is a prospero reference number which can be quoted for protocol registration)

Ability to rename, delete, and merge labels and exclusion reasons. Badly needed!

Often I want to remove an exclusion or inclusion reason, or a label, but I'm unable to scroll down to the bottom of the list of reasons/labels. I see all the reasons/labels that I haven't assigned to a particular article, but ones I want to remove aren't accessible. This might occur more often when there are lots of reasons/labels - I don't remember.

make it easier to toggle between the refs you have screened and those you have yet to screen. It's very unstable as it is. You have to screen in small batches.

Extraction tool

Add the ability to filter by year to your mobile app.

Be able to reject in two waves, so title screening and abstract screening can be done separately