Ability to rename, delete, and merge labels and exclusion reasons. Badly needed!

If you are unable to connect your printer from your PC or you are unable to get your desired print, whatever your problem is, you can trust us for fixing it.@Please dial the @Epson Printer Support Number UK@ and take the resolution of any problem from us. To know more visit: http://contact-help-number.co.uk/epson-printer-support-number.php

Re-order exclusion reasons. This could be either manual, or dynamically by frequency or recency

be able to filter based on whether it was judged by only one individual or both.

Like the Tinder dating app. Each study would then be loaded individually on screen and upon swiping, the next article would present itself. Swiping up or down could mean previous or next, respectively without making a decision.

So for example to be able to download only undecided articles. This would be especially great for large databases of studies.

have a random number generator or a random citation generator from within a review - is second review only reviewing a proportion of citations would allow this to be truly random

Thanks

Would be really useful if, when the option 'unsure' was checked, if it would display this decision similarly to the 'include' and 'exclude' then it would be clear to other reviewers that there is uncertainty over this reference rather than there being no decision shown which leads to uncertainty over whether this has been examined or not.

Ability to set number of reviewers per article.

Ex: be able to see all articles that don't contain the words "surgery", "surgeries", "surgeon", "surgeons", "surgical", etc.

It would be very helpful in excluding some articles.

When opening the app, let it automatically jump to the last abstract you've reviewed instead of scrolling down

meta analysis tool

Be able to reject in two waves, so title screening and abstract screening can be done separately

Ability to pre-set number of reviews per abstract with the blind-on for multi-reviewer teams.

Link resolver / OpenURL linking

Re-use inclusion/exclusion keywords which were defined for a previous review (import/export inclusion/exclusion keywords).

Explanation: I created an extensive set of inclusion/exclusion keywords for screening prediction studies. I would like to re-use them on a different review, without having to type them in again.

I have divided a set of papers by authors for I and my colleagues to screen. But when I opened the app, they were no longer ordered by author alphabetically. Can you make ur possible to order them this way?

Minimise orange tabs on bottom right!
!

Each reference should have a setting for the minimum number of reviewers it needs a decision from. For instance, if reference #13 gets an "exclude" from at least 2 reviewers, it should automatically be moved to "Excluded" category without needing a decision from a third reviewer.

add a numbering column so that users can divide articles for reviewers. For example, reviewer 1 could be assigned abstracts numbers 1-20. and articles can be sorted by number. There could also be a feature for random assignment of the numbers.