blinding of author/institution/journal

Logical rules to deal with inclusion / exclusion:
ie: A and B say include but C says don't -
allow to make A a higher priority member so that A plus B or C would be included but
B and C without A would still be a conflict

The creator would have the ability to blind a few users while others remain unblinded. This way, multiple users can work on the project without having the same blind status.

Currently if I am in the "unresolved duplicates" category and delete duplicates, they get added to the "deleted" folder but they stay under the "unresolved" category unless I refresh it. Similarly, when I am in the "undecided" category and I include or exclude an article, it stays in the undecided category until I go into the category again. It would be good if these were automatically moved out of these lists after applying these actions, as it gets confusing & is annoying to have to manually refresh every single time.

be able to filter based on whether it was judged by only one individual or both.

Make more than one "owner" on a review, or give all owner functions to additional collaborators, so that all settings and administration does not have to depend on the "owner". Particular helpful for example if the creator of the reviewer only works part-time, or needs help with finding specific settings.

A count of total number of cumulative conflicts (and between which reviewers) throughout the whole review process, even after the conflicts have been resolved.

Make it possible to add comments to the different References that you include or exclude.

Using keywords or labels to exclude (rather than include) abstracts when filtering

Would be really useful if, when the option 'unsure' was checked, if it would display this decision similarly to the 'include' and 'exclude' then it would be clear to other reviewers that there is uncertainty over this reference rather than there being no decision shown which leads to uncertainty over whether this has been examined or not.

Improving the phone app so it does not have to download content after only a short amount of use would be useful. Or at least still being able to filter when this happens. Or maybe being able to sort in different ways.

Apologies if this function exists already but I have not found out how to do on the phone app

Ability to rename, delete, and merge labels and exclusion reasons. Badly needed!

Ability to set number of reviewers per article.

Announcements when Rayyan is down or not functioning properly

Add the ability to filter by year to your mobile app.

Allow multiple tags to be selected before the dropdown menu closes

Being able to use AND when two or more labels are selected. Eg a reference must have both selected labels to be displayed. Currently all references that have either of these labels are displayed.

Add an indicator next to folders on left (e.g. keywords, duplicates etc) which shows percentage of papers resolved in that folder. This may also be achieved with a colour coded strip indicating red for incomplete and green for complete. This would then enable a reviewer to move on to other folders without going back and forth into folders already resolved.

Re-order exclusion reasons. This could be either manual, or dynamically by frequency or recency