The app goes back to abstract #1every single time it updates the reasons for inclusion or exclusion. I am at abstract 1500 and when the app Updates I have to go scroll back to abstract 1500 ...this is a waste of time and is extremely annoying! Please fix this bug .

Need to select two filters: undecided and then most of 1 (reviewed), but the second filter is nowhere to be found in the app. This means, the app can not be used...

Discover men's scarves with ASOS. A scarf can wrap up any outfit, whatever the weather. From chunky and knitted scarves, to silk and cashmere scarves. https://100dapperboys.com/top-5-hair-accessories-for-men/

I am recovering my password an not receiving the recovery email. Not in spam. It also says confirm account which I did a month ago.

Data Communications Engineer, you will carry out designing work for data communication products, like LAN switches, routers, network security systems and so on. You will be implementing an acceptance test for both products and technical solutions, as well as facilitating projects and monitoring the work of service partners and subcontractors.
https://www.fieldengineer.com/skills/data-communication-engineer

Currently the DOI field present in my original RIS file is not visible in Rayyan. It would also be useful to be able to export the DOI as a separate field in the export options offered by Rayyan

Function to highlight all entries generated for specific criteria (e.g. Ctrl + A) so that exclusion criteria can be applied in bulk

I have a problem with changing my password.I keep get the message Reset PasswordToken is invalid. What do I do wrong? I need to get in contact with my database!

In de Rayyan app it would be nice if you can go immediately to where you left off, especially when you have a lot of references, now you have to scroll endless to get at ref 1400 eg (and still 600 to go). It would be great if you can jump to a number of your references

It would be great to be able to randomly assign collaborators a percentage of the papers to review.

Desktop version: Right now you can use your left hand to tag a reference with I E and M but you need the right hand to move the cursor.

Could you add the option in settings to automatically move one down once the I E or M key are pressed?

Could you also - for those who don't want to move one down automatically - offer the option to re-map a key so it works as the down cursor? Examples are one of the function keys (F1-F6), the ~ key or the spacebar

HELP! My review was lost and i cant access it anymore

Make it possible to enter a layered review structure.
Often researchers start with screening articles on title. The articles selected on title will be screened on abstract. And thereafter on full article.
Now I have to make serveral reviews for 1 article

Hi,

In trying to solve the fact that I accidently deleted some articles (as there is no undo button I had to solve it manually) I entered back in the 10 articles (across 3 documents) into my review. So 10 articles added back in. At this stage, I had zero unresolved duplicates as I had finished screening them. However, on putting these 10 back in - my unresolved duplicates now stands at 1236?!! HOW! I don't understand.

In the mobile app, whenever one does study selection and stop, the next time it starts from the first study and requires to scroll down to where the selection has to continue.

This could be improved such that one can continue selection from the area where he/she lastly stopped. The app is quite handy and study selection could be done even during commuting.

While it is necessary to have the blind mode on during double screening (so that one reviewer's decision does not influence the other's decision), being able to designate labels or generate more specific exclusion criteria reasons (at least on the part of the review creator) that can be used by all reviewers would be extremely helpful. Labels allow designation of a subset of articles for intial screening, and exclusion reasons often need to be made more specific for the review at hand. This is true regardless of the need for Blind mode.

resolved duplicates automatically