Make it possible to enter a layered review structure.
Often researchers start with screening articles on title. The articles selected on title will be screened on abstract. And thereafter on full article.
Now I have to make serveral reviews for 1 article

It would be great to be able to randomly assign collaborators a percentage of the papers to review.

In the mobile app, whenever one does study selection and stop, the next time it starts from the first study and requires to scroll down to where the selection has to continue.

This could be improved such that one can continue selection from the area where he/she lastly stopped. The app is quite handy and study selection could be done even during commuting.

While it is necessary to have the blind mode on during double screening (so that one reviewer's decision does not influence the other's decision), being able to designate labels or generate more specific exclusion criteria reasons (at least on the part of the review creator) that can be used by all reviewers would be extremely helpful. Labels allow designation of a subset of articles for intial screening, and exclusion reasons often need to be made more specific for the review at hand. This is true regardless of the need for Blind mode.

A labeling system that can be created together with a peer. If this is made beforehand it will be easier to use

To make the resolving of conflicts easier, it would be nice if we have an option to select the titles that a reviewer included/excluded. Discussing them and resolving them will be much easier.

In de Rayyan app it would be nice if you can go immediately to where you left off, especially when you have a lot of references, now you have to scroll endless to get at ref 1400 eg (and still 600 to go). It would be great if you can jump to a number of your references

Filter 'out' button. As in I can filter out a key word and see what entries remain.

Being able to make notes and mark text during full text screening on the pdf-file

Would be fantastic if you could set the % function for duplicates to automatically delete all duplicates that are of a certain % match (e.g. automatically remove all duplicates that are 95% or greater similarity)

Preciso de auxílio urgente! Eu comecei a fazer a análise com o aplicativo e após as duplicatas sobraram 722 artigos, comecei a avaliar e depois apareceu que haviam apenas 221 artigos (os outros sumiram). Depois de alguns dias os outros 722 retornaram, mas depois de mais dias sumiram novamente e continua aparecendo apenas 221. Podem me ajudar?

Hello, what if I want to retrieve a reference (only one out of many) that I categorized as “not duplicate” instead of deleting it? Thanks in advance for your help!

Poder reiniciar la selección de artículos. A veces pueden cambiar algunos criterios y esto requiere empezar de nuevo la revisión de los documentos.

Comme j'ai dit, trouver un moyen de descendre plus vite dans l'application sur téléphone. Si on a des milliers d'articles, ça fait trop long pour descendre. Il faudrait pouvoir écrire le numéro de l'article qu'on désire voir, ou quelque chose du genre.

Allow us to search for keywords by title only. It would make exclusion go way faster at first. I noticed that I can do this in your mobile app, but not on the web app.

Generate automatically the final flowchart selection

The owner ofreview added imams exclusion keywords which are very useful during screening at my laptop. However this is list when using the app, which prolongs screening using the app much longer. Or Did I miss something?

Move the "Review Chat" window away from the scrolling bar of the abstract view.

Keep a history of what labels & reasons have been added/removed to each reference and by who

Add numbers to the articles so that people can collaborate on parts of the review.