Ability to pre-define consistent inclusion/exclusion reasons for all reviewers in a project, to be set by review owner.

keep all original bibliographic data!

When uploading references and subsequently downloading these references some information is lost. eg the following fields are empty after downloading from rayyan. DOI, name of database, database provider, keywords, date field. These field are at times necessary for further processing so would it be possible to leave the original reference intact when exporting back to reference software.

Allow to identify a reference as duplicate when not picked up by Rayyan

One essential featire that is need for this app is to have the opportunity to remember our screening position (that is which article/record number) We let reviewed and start us from there. Every time I open the app, it takes me to the beginning of the articles to be sxreenes is 1/xxx and I have to scroll to number 100,200, etc from there. That is so so so inefficient. Please improve the app to enable us continue fro. Where we left off. As is, it makes things very tedious.

Be able to edit/add abstracts to records if they didn't import.

Include a "notes" feature so that notes can be added to individual articles

Add ability to upload text file with record of replicable search strategy

An option to manually highlight in abstracts

Create custom groups

PubMed records often include DOI field. Linking to the article via DOI resolver would speed up full text assessment where needed.

As many times, this box causes unnecessary obstacles in using the interface to manage/ resolve duplicates, especially for new learners. It may be solved by making mobile like caller's image in skype.

Provide a "No label" filter option so that a reviewer can see the records that don't have any labels assigned to them.

I can export files in RefMan format (I don't think RefMan exists anymore as of last year), but not Mendeley. Could you add that at some point?

Ability to highlight and add notes to the uploaded PDF attatched

It would be useful to be able to edit the description once a review has been created.

Ability to display and import/export a local record number, like an EndNote or Reference Manager reference ID

would like to have 1 file and several reviewers screening simultaneously only 2 records each, instead of have to split multiple files for pair of reviewers

Differentiate selection based on abstract and title AND selection based on full text.

Calculate Kappa statistics for Concordance between two reviewers

When uploading PubMed xml data, only the TI field is added to Rayyan. If articles not in English only populate the TT (tranliterated title) field, then no title is included in Rayyan. Using the TT field if the TI field is empty or "Not Available" would aid in screening.

Allow results to be hidden after title/abstract stage so team can move to full-text without having to create a new project.