Ability to display and import/export a local record number, like an EndNote or Reference Manager reference ID

Allow to identify a reference as duplicate when not picked up by Rayyan

One essential featire that is need for this app is to have the opportunity to remember our screening position (that is which article/record number) We let reviewed and start us from there. Every time I open the app, it takes me to the beginning of the articles to be sxreenes is 1/xxx and I have to scroll to number 100,200, etc from there. That is so so so inefficient. Please improve the app to enable us continue fro. Where we left off. As is, it makes things very tedious.

would like to have 1 file and several reviewers screening simultaneously only 2 records each, instead of have to split multiple files for pair of reviewers

Add ability to upload text file with record of replicable search strategy

Provide a "No label" filter option so that a reviewer can see the records that don't have any labels assigned to them.

Allow results to be hidden after title/abstract stage so team can move to full-text without having to create a new project.

It would be useful to be able to edit the description once a review has been created.

Ability to pre-define consistent inclusion/exclusion reasons for all reviewers in a project, to be set by review owner.

It would be useful to have a desktop version of Rayyan which allows offline work to be done but syncs with the web when online (like the mobile app) .

Feature suggestion: It would be handy to be able to edit the reasons I've already given. In this case, I've noticed that one reason is used very commonly, so I'd like to move this one to the top of the list by changing it's name so it begins with a 1. There might be other reasons to edit a reason, though.

Create custom groups

Add capability to edit labels by batch (ie, modify label and have changes carry through all records with label).

PubMed records often include DOI field. Linking to the article via DOI resolver would speed up full text assessment where needed.

Search box is useful only for searching for a specific title but it doesn't work for searching by author or system ID. Expanding the searching capabilities of this feature will be beneficial for improving discovery within the system.

Quick scrolling option to get to the article you left off on during your last session.

Settings that allow owner to limit number of reviewers needed per article (e.g. set it so that even if 4 reviewers, article only needs 2 decisions and is then taken out of pool of undecided)

have multiple reveiw members on a project within 1 file, and each record reviewed by pair of reviewers only

It will be good if facility for assessing quality of individual studies is included.

Manual marking of duplicates