It would be great to be able to randomly assign collaborators a percentage of the papers to review.

Make it possible to enter a layered review structure.
Often researchers start with screening articles on title. The articles selected on title will be screened on abstract. And thereafter on full article.
Now I have to make serveral reviews for 1 article

In de Rayyan app it would be nice if you can go immediately to where you left off, especially when you have a lot of references, now you have to scroll endless to get at ref 1400 eg (and still 600 to go). It would be great if you can jump to a number of your references

In the mobile app, whenever one does study selection and stop, the next time it starts from the first study and requires to scroll down to where the selection has to continue.

This could be improved such that one can continue selection from the area where he/she lastly stopped. The app is quite handy and study selection could be done even during commuting.

Até chegar ao artigo que eu quero... E cada vez que eu saio da aplicação e volto, tenho de voltar 1 a 1 novamente ao artigo em que tinha ficado. Não há maneira de ir logo para o artigo pretendido? É que ainda não consigo usar a aplicação.

I imported files from Scopus, WoS and Ebscho to work with Rayyan. Now I want to use Bibexcel. Is there is any way to export in a compatible file without losing information?

resolved duplicates automatically

A labeling system that can be created together with a peer. If this is made beforehand it will be easier to use

While it is necessary to have the blind mode on during double screening (so that one reviewer's decision does not influence the other's decision), being able to designate labels or generate more specific exclusion criteria reasons (at least on the part of the review creator) that can be used by all reviewers would be extremely helpful. Labels allow designation of a subset of articles for intial screening, and exclusion reasons often need to be made more specific for the review at hand. This is true regardless of the need for Blind mode.

Would be fantastic if you could set the % function for duplicates to automatically delete all duplicates that are of a certain % match (e.g. automatically remove all duplicates that are 95% or greater similarity)

Hello, what if I want to retrieve a reference (only one out of many) that I categorized as “not duplicate” instead of deleting it? Thanks in advance for your help!

Filter 'out' button. As in I can filter out a key word and see what entries remain.

Being able to make notes and mark text during full text screening on the pdf-file

Comme j'ai dit, trouver un moyen de descendre plus vite dans l'application sur téléphone. Si on a des milliers d'articles, ça fait trop long pour descendre. Il faudrait pouvoir écrire le numéro de l'article qu'on désire voir, ou quelque chose du genre.

Allow us to search for keywords by title only. It would make exclusion go way faster at first. I noticed that I can do this in your mobile app, but not on the web app.

Generate automatically the final flowchart selection

Move the "Review Chat" window away from the scrolling bar of the abstract view.

Poder reiniciar la selección de artículos. A veces pueden cambiar algunos criterios y esto requiere empezar de nuevo la revisión de los documentos.

The owner ofreview added imams exclusion keywords which are very useful during screening at my laptop. However this is list when using the app, which prolongs screening using the app much longer. Or Did I miss something?