The app goes back to abstract #1every single time it updates the reasons for inclusion or exclusion. I am at abstract 1500 and when the app Updates I have to go scroll back to abstract 1500 ...this is a waste of time and is extremely annoying! Please fix this bug .

It would be great to be able to sort by included/excluded status

After signieren in the App stops and does Not do anything

A small addition that would be helpful to have is a one handed set-up.
right now, if i REALLY stretch my left hand i can get to E, I and arrow down, but it would be a lot easier if i could just rebind the keys so that
W = arrow up
S = arrow down
D = exclude
A= include

Or something similar.

resolved duplicates automatically

Currently the DOI field present in my original RIS file is not visible in Rayyan. It would also be useful to be able to export the DOI as a separate field in the export options offered by Rayyan

Desktop version: Right now you can use your left hand to tag a reference with I E and M but you need the right hand to move the cursor.

Could you add the option in settings to automatically move one down once the I E or M key are pressed?

Could you also - for those who don't want to move one down automatically - offer the option to re-map a key so it works as the down cursor? Examples are one of the function keys (F1-F6), the ~ key or the spacebar

In de Rayyan app it would be nice if you can go immediately to where you left off, especially when you have a lot of references, now you have to scroll endless to get at ref 1400 eg (and still 600 to go). It would be great if you can jump to a number of your references

It would be great to be able to randomly assign collaborators a percentage of the papers to review.

Make it possible to enter a layered review structure.
Often researchers start with screening articles on title. The articles selected on title will be screened on abstract. And thereafter on full article.
Now I have to make serveral reviews for 1 article

While it is necessary to have the blind mode on during double screening (so that one reviewer's decision does not influence the other's decision), being able to designate labels or generate more specific exclusion criteria reasons (at least on the part of the review creator) that can be used by all reviewers would be extremely helpful. Labels allow designation of a subset of articles for intial screening, and exclusion reasons often need to be made more specific for the review at hand. This is true regardless of the need for Blind mode.

In the mobile app, whenever one does study selection and stop, the next time it starts from the first study and requires to scroll down to where the selection has to continue.

This could be improved such that one can continue selection from the area where he/she lastly stopped. The app is quite handy and study selection could be done even during commuting.

Hello, what if I want to retrieve a reference (only one out of many) that I categorized as “not duplicate” instead of deleting it? Thanks in advance for your help!

A labeling system that can be created together with a peer. If this is made beforehand it will be easier to use

Comme j'ai dit, trouver un moyen de descendre plus vite dans l'application sur téléphone. Si on a des milliers d'articles, ça fait trop long pour descendre. Il faudrait pouvoir écrire le numéro de l'article qu'on désire voir, ou quelque chose du genre.

Filter 'out' button. As in I can filter out a key word and see what entries remain.

Being able to make notes and mark text during full text screening on the pdf-file

Move the "Review Chat" window away from the scrolling bar of the abstract view.