In the mobile app, whenever one does study selection and stop, the next time it starts from the first study and requires to scroll down to where the selection has to continue.

This could be improved such that one can continue selection from the area where he/she lastly stopped. The app is quite handy and study selection could be done even during commuting.

To make the resolving of conflicts easier, it would be nice if we have an option to select the titles that a reviewer included/excluded. Discussing them and resolving them will be much easier.

While it is necessary to have the blind mode on during double screening (so that one reviewer's decision does not influence the other's decision), being able to designate labels or generate more specific exclusion criteria reasons (at least on the part of the review creator) that can be used by all reviewers would be extremely helpful. Labels allow designation of a subset of articles for intial screening, and exclusion reasons often need to be made more specific for the review at hand. This is true regardless of the need for Blind mode.

Make it possible to enter a layered review structure.
Often researchers start with screening articles on title. The articles selected on title will be screened on abstract. And thereafter on full article.
Now I have to make serveral reviews for 1 article

Generate automatically the final flowchart selection

A labeling system that can be created together with a peer. If this is made beforehand it will be easier to use

Move the "Review Chat" window away from the scrolling bar of the abstract view.

Hello, what if I want to retrieve a reference (only one out of many) that I categorized as “not duplicate” instead of deleting it? Thanks in advance for your help!

Filter 'out' button. As in I can filter out a key word and see what entries remain.

Be able to upload a folder of PDF files

It would be great to be able to randomly assign collaborators a percentage of the papers to review.

Melhorar o gerenciamento das duplicatas.

There should be an ability to change/update the reason for exclusion. For eg: I had initially mentioned "case report" as an exclusion criteria. Now I want to update it to "Case report or case series"

It will be a good idea to link the search summary with may be a unique ID or hyperlink which can be mentioned in the final manuscript (Like there is a prospero reference number which can be quoted for protocol registration)

Being able to make notes and mark text during full text screening on the pdf-file

Sortering av fulltextartiklar efter relevans i ett nätsa steg efter sortering av abstracts

Load full list of titles and make it scrollable, do not refresh the list, this is quite annoying and causes me to loose track of the title list.

It appears that authors with "and" somewhere in their name are formatted incorrectly.

Example from Rayyan:
Authors: , Br s, J. Garvey, G. Anderson, K. ...

The first author should be Brands, J. For some reason, Rayyan has disregarded the "and" misformatted the name - this is an issue when re-importing to EndNote.

Comme j'ai dit, trouver un moyen de descendre plus vite dans l'application sur téléphone. Si on a des milliers d'articles, ça fait trop long pour descendre. Il faudrait pouvoir écrire le numéro de l'article qu'on désire voir, ou quelque chose du genre.

Allow us to search for keywords by title only. It would make exclusion go way faster at first. I noticed that I can do this in your mobile app, but not on the web app.