I would like to ask you a q. regarding how Rayyan optimizes randomization for screening.

For example, does Rayyan create or has a function to create a random list of references for each reviewer? If the list is the same for all collaborators, and only two are expected to evaluate each article then the first two persons who works on the project will evaluate same set of articles. There won't be randomization of article allocation for each reviewer. Of course, more optimal would be to have random pair of collaborators evaluate random set of articles. Any thoughts??

It would be great to be able to sort by included/excluded status

After signieren in the App stops and does Not do anything

A small addition that would be helpful to have is a one handed set-up.
right now, if i REALLY stretch my left hand i can get to E, I and arrow down, but it would be a lot easier if i could just rebind the keys so that
W = arrow up
S = arrow down
D = exclude
A= include

Or something similar.

The app goes back to abstract #1every single time it updates the reasons for inclusion or exclusion. I am at abstract 1500 and when the app Updates I have to go scroll back to abstract 1500 ...this is a waste of time and is extremely annoying! Please fix this bug .

Desktop version: Right now you can use your left hand to tag a reference with I E and M but you need the right hand to move the cursor.

Could you add the option in settings to automatically move one down once the I E or M key are pressed?

Could you also - for those who don't want to move one down automatically - offer the option to re-map a key so it works as the down cursor? Examples are one of the function keys (F1-F6), the ~ key or the spacebar

Currently the DOI field present in my original RIS file is not visible in Rayyan. It would also be useful to be able to export the DOI as a separate field in the export options offered by Rayyan

resolved duplicates automatically

In de Rayyan app it would be nice if you can go immediately to where you left off, especially when you have a lot of references, now you have to scroll endless to get at ref 1400 eg (and still 600 to go). It would be great if you can jump to a number of your references

PDFs of the references and tools to highlight and analyzed the included references in the app.

Poder reiniciar la selección de artículos. A veces pueden cambiar algunos criterios y esto requiere empezar de nuevo la revisión de los documentos.

Comme j'ai dit, trouver un moyen de descendre plus vite dans l'application sur téléphone. Si on a des milliers d'articles, ça fait trop long pour descendre. Il faudrait pouvoir écrire le numéro de l'article qu'on désire voir, ou quelque chose du genre.

Allow us to search for keywords by title only. It would make exclusion go way faster at first. I noticed that I can do this in your mobile app, but not on the web app.

It would be great to be able to randomly assign collaborators a percentage of the papers to review.

The owner ofreview added imams exclusion keywords which are very useful during screening at my laptop. However this is list when using the app, which prolongs screening using the app much longer. Or Did I miss something?

Ipad and Android: would be very time saving if the next reference for screening would show immediately after selecting include or exclude, instead of having to scroll down.

Hello, what if I want to retrieve a reference (only one out of many) that I categorized as “not duplicate” instead of deleting it? Thanks in advance for your help!

Filter 'out' button. As in I can filter out a key word and see what entries remain.