In the mobile app, whenever one does study selection and stop, the next time it starts from the first study and requires to scroll down to where the selection has to continue.

This could be improved such that one can continue selection from the area where he/she lastly stopped. The app is quite handy and study selection could be done even during commuting.

Generate automatically the final flowchart selection

Be able to upload a folder of PDF files

Automatisch verspringen naar het volgende artikel als iemand heet geïn- of excludeerd.

Melhorar o gerenciamento das duplicatas.

While it is necessary to have the blind mode on during double screening (so that one reviewer's decision does not influence the other's decision), being able to designate labels or generate more specific exclusion criteria reasons (at least on the part of the review creator) that can be used by all reviewers would be extremely helpful. Labels allow designation of a subset of articles for intial screening, and exclusion reasons often need to be made more specific for the review at hand. This is true regardless of the need for Blind mode.

Sortering av fulltextartiklar efter relevans i ett nätsa steg efter sortering av abstracts

Add numbers to the articles so that people can collaborate on parts of the review.

It would be better if we have the option to resolve duplicates in mobile app

I am in a Systematic Review workshop, and we are looking at Rayyan along with some other tools. A concern from several participants is what would happen if QCRI stopped supporting Rayyan or if it was bought by Elsevier, etc.

Making Rayyan an open source prioject would help allay some of these concerns. The QCRI team could also benefit from community input.

It appears that authors with "and" somewhere in their name are formatted incorrectly.

Example from Rayyan:
Authors: , Br s, J. Garvey, G. Anderson, K. ...

The first author should be Brands, J. For some reason, Rayyan has disregarded the "and" misformatted the name - this is an issue when re-importing to EndNote.

Just like "undecided", there should also be "unlabelled" category

It will be a good idea to link the search summary with may be a unique ID or hyperlink which can be mentioned in the final manuscript (Like there is a prospero reference number which can be quoted for protocol registration)

There should be an ability to change/update the reason for exclusion. For eg: I had initially mentioned "case report" as an exclusion criteria. Now I want to update it to "Case report or case series"

make it easier to toggle between the refs you have screened and those you have yet to screen. It's very unstable as it is. You have to screen in small batches.

Extraction tool

Move the "Review Chat" window away from the scrolling bar of the abstract view.

Make it possible to enter a layered review structure.
Often researchers start with screening articles on title. The articles selected on title will be screened on abstract. And thereafter on full article.
Now I have to make serveral reviews for 1 article

Often I want to remove an exclusion or inclusion reason, or a label, but I'm unable to scroll down to the bottom of the list of reasons/labels. I see all the reasons/labels that I haven't assigned to a particular article, but ones I want to remove aren't accessible. This might occur more often when there are lots of reasons/labels - I don't remember.

Load full list of titles and make it scrollable, do not refresh the list, this is quite annoying and causes me to loose track of the title list.