Scroll option in the mobile app

Ability to pre-define consistent inclusion/exclusion reasons for all reviewers in a project, to be set by review owner.

Allow results to be hidden after title/abstract stage so team can move to full-text without having to create a new project.

Sort by first author
One big improvement with Rayyan would be if you could choose how you would like to sort your abstract. Today you can sort your abstract by rating, which is great. But it would be perfect if it also was possible to sort by:

• First author (even if it could happen that a study have multiple first authors, you sort by the first name)

• By year (If you would like to look at fresh publications, you choose: 2016)

keep all original bibliographic data!

When uploading references and subsequently downloading these references some information is lost. eg the following fields are empty after downloading from rayyan. DOI, name of database, database provider, keywords, date field. These field are at times necessary for further processing so would it be possible to leave the original reference intact when exporting back to reference software.

Currently, 'Inclusion decisions' conatin the items 'Undecided', 'Included' and 'Excluded'.
From a systematic reviewer's point of view it would be great to have the additional item 'Potentially relevant' meaning publications which need to be checked as full text. This would differ these publications from 'Undecided' which should refer to 'Awaiting classification' or something similar.
Also, a 'First check exclusion' button would be great (both as a button and an additional item for 'Inclusion decisions') for abstracts which clearly do not address the research question and can be quickly eliminated.

Please add a feature to distinguish which reviewer provided which exclusion reason. This should also be stored in the export files like the decisions are stored for each reviewer.

would like to have 1 file and several reviewers screening simultaneously only 2 records each, instead of have to split multiple files for pair of reviewers

PubMed records often include DOI field. Linking to the article via DOI resolver would speed up full text assessment where needed.

Allow to identify a reference as duplicate when not picked up by Rayyan

Title screening only option on phone or tablet

have multiple reveiw members on a project within 1 file, and each record reviewed by pair of reviewers only

Combination of Labels by search operators OR and AND . T

Good if you can develop a facility to upload PDF full-texts direct from the source like the way EndNote and Mendeley do, Or
Good if you can develop a facility to upload references from EndNote/Mendeley along with the PDF full-texts when it is available with the citation.

An option for change the font size!

One essential featire that is need for this app is to have the opportunity to remember our screening position (that is which article/record number) We let reviewed and start us from there. Every time I open the app, it takes me to the beginning of the articles to be sxreenes is 1/xxx and I have to scroll to number 100,200, etc from there. That is so so so inefficient. Please improve the app to enable us continue fro. Where we left off. As is, it makes things very tedious.

As well as being able to sort by date, title and rating, being able to sort by PDF upload status (presence or absence) would help speed up the full text search and upload process.
Thank you for the keyboard shortcut for 'PDF upload'!

It will be good if facility for assessing quality of individual studies is included.

Quick scrolling option to get to the article you left off on during your last session.