I suggest you ...

Managing multiple reviewers and setting minimum number of reviewers per article

have multiple reveiw members on a project within 1 file, and each record reviewed by pair of reviewers only

43 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    julia.bidonde@usask.ca shared this idea  ·   ·  Admin →

    5 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • jalyon@cmh.edu commented  · 

        Ability to pre-set number of reviews per abstract with the blind-on for multi-reviewer teams.

      • rogerwong@wustl.edu commented  · 

        Each reference should have a setting for the minimum number of reviewers it needs a decision from. For instance, if reference #13 gets an "exclude" from at least 2 reviewers, it should automatically be moved to "Excluded" category without needing a decision from a third reviewer.

      • julia.bidonde@usask.ca commented  · 

        would like to have 1 file and several reviewers screening simultaneously only 2 records each, instead of have to split multiple files for pair of reviewers

      • smvisintini@gmail.com commented  · 

        Settings that allow owner to limit number of reviewers needed per article (e.g. set it so that even if 4 reviewers, article only needs 2 decisions and is then taken out of pool of undecided)

      Feedback and Knowledge Base