Managing multiple reviewers and setting minimum number of reviewers per article
have multiple reveiw members on a project within 1 file, and each record reviewed by pair of reviewers only
Do you mean, e.g. to randomly assign papers to reviewers? So say you have 2000 papers to review, you can randomly distribute the papers so that both reviewers have a random set of 1000 papers to review?
Ability to allocate certain ranges of items to each reviewer at the start of the review process
have a random number generator or a random citation generator from within a review - is second review only reviewing a proportion of citations would allow this to be truly random
Agree. It is unclear how to sort out a conflict and change it to either INCLUDE/EXCLUDE?
Ability to pre-set number of reviews per abstract with the blind-on for multi-reviewer teams.
Each reference should have a setting for the minimum number of reviewers it needs a decision from. For instance, if reference #13 gets an "exclude" from at least 2 reviewers, it should automatically be moved to "Excluded" category without needing a decision from a third reviewer.
would like to have 1 file and several reviewers screening simultaneously only 2 records each, instead of have to split multiple files for pair of reviewers
Settings that allow owner to limit number of reviewers needed per article (e.g. set it so that even if 4 reviewers, article only needs 2 decisions and is then taken out of pool of undecided)