Managing multiple reviewers and setting minimum number of reviewers per article
have multiple reveiw members on a project within 1 file, and each record reviewed by pair of reviewers only
I second this. This is by far the most important feature. In Covidence I am able to set a counter for 1 or 2 reviewers required to screen an article.The article then moves to included/excluded/conflict after enough votes are gathered.
This is absolutely vital! It would solve a ton of problems with team reviews if we could set the number of required reviewers per article. That way, once an article has 2 (or 3) reviews, no one else sees it during the review process. I've usually assigned by year, but that doesn't work on the rayyan app. So I'm trying by author last name alphabetic range, but it's a nuisance. Please give us the option to set the number of reviewers per article!
Assign articles to reviewers. Biggest need by far.
Do you mean, e.g. to randomly assign papers to reviewers? So say you have 2000 papers to review, you can randomly distribute the papers so that both reviewers have a random set of 1000 papers to review?
Ability to allocate certain ranges of items to each reviewer at the start of the review process
have a random number generator or a random citation generator from within a review - is second review only reviewing a proportion of citations would allow this to be truly random
Agree. It is unclear how to sort out a conflict and change it to either INCLUDE/EXCLUDE?
Ability to pre-set number of reviews per abstract with the blind-on for multi-reviewer teams.
add a numbering column so that users can divide articles for reviewers. For example, reviewer 1 could be assigned abstracts numbers 1-20. and articles can be sorted by number. There could also be a feature for random assignment of the numbers.
Each reference should have a setting for the minimum number of reviewers it needs a decision from. For instance, if reference #13 gets an "exclude" from at least 2 reviewers, it should automatically be moved to "Excluded" category without needing a decision from a third reviewer.
would like to have 1 file and several reviewers screening simultaneously only 2 records each, instead of have to split multiple files for pair of reviewers
Settings that allow owner to limit number of reviewers needed per article (e.g. set it so that even if 4 reviewers, article only needs 2 decisions and is then taken out of pool of undecided)