I suggest you ...

← General

Have a 'Primary Researcher' override option for inclusion/exclusion decisions

Most reviews will have a primary researcher that may review all title/abstract results, with collaborators doing a percentage for inclusion validity/reliability. It is likely there will be some conflict, and there needs to be a 'resolution' or 'override' function available to the primary researcher. These conflicting results still need to be resolved, but at the moment they are automatically excluded.

36 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Violette McGaw shared this idea  ·   ·  Admin →

    6 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Forgot password?
      Create a password
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Close
      Close
      Submitting...
      • beatriz.varman@library.tmc.edu commented  · 

        Be able to change a reviewer's vote as the owner of the account after talking to reviewers and agreeing on the change rather than waiting for everyone to change their votes.

      • Anonymous commented  · 

        I agree that this is absolutely necessary.

      • Tristan Price commented  · 

        This would be useful at it would speed up the resolution of conflicts. At the moment if there is two of us who have blind reviewed, then we have to sit together, both with laptops on. With this functions then resolution would be quicker as only the lead reviewer would need to make the changes.

      • Anonymous commented  · 

        This is a mandatory feature to be usable for systematic reviews.

      General

      Feedback and Knowledge Base

      (thinking…)