General

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  1. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Layered review (on title, abstract and full article)

    Make it possible to enter a layered review structure.
    Often researchers start with screening articles on title. The articles selected on title will be screened on abstract. And thereafter on full article.
    Now I have to make serveral reviews for 1 article

    11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Editing Exclusion reason

    There should be an ability to change/update the reason for exclusion. For eg: I had initially mentioned "case report" as an exclusion criteria. Now I want to update it to "Case report or case series"

    3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Make Rayyan Open Source

    I am in a Systematic Review workshop, and we are looking at Rayyan along with some other tools. A concern from several participants is what would happen if QCRI stopped supporting Rayyan or if it was bought by Elsevier, etc.

    Making Rayyan an open source prioject would help allay some of these concerns. The QCRI team could also benefit from community input.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Errors in author names

    It appears that authors with "and" somewhere in their name are formatted incorrectly.

    Example from Rayyan:
    Authors: , Br s, J. Garvey, G. Anderson, K. ...

    The first author should be Brands, J. For some reason, Rayyan has disregarded the "and" misformatted the name - this is an issue when re-importing to EndNote.

    5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Bulk delete pre-added inlcude/exclude terms

    Multi-select keywords to include/exclude so the suggested ones can be deleted in bulk.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Repeated downloads on the phone app

    Improving the phone app so it does not have to download content after only a short amount of use would be useful. Or at least still being able to filter when this happens. Or maybe being able to sort in different ways.

    Apologies if this function exists already but I have not found out how to do on the phone app

    15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Avoid refresh title screening list

    Load full list of titles and make it scrollable, do not refresh the list, this is quite annoying and causes me to loose track of the title list.

    12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Make more than one "owner" on a review

    Make more than one "owner" on a review, or give all owner functions to additional collaborators, so that all settings and administration does not have to depend on the "owner". Particular helpful for example if the creator of the reviewer only works part-time, or needs help with finding specific settings.

    7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Allowing all collaborators to see user-created labels and exclusion reasons in Blind mode.

    While it is necessary to have the blind mode on during double screening (so that one reviewer's decision does not influence the other's decision), being able to designate labels or generate more specific exclusion criteria reasons (at least on the part of the review creator) that can be used by all reviewers would be extremely helpful. Labels allow designation of a subset of articles for intial screening, and exclusion reasons often need to be made more specific for the review at hand. This is true regardless of the need for Blind mode.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Just like "undecided", there should also be "unlabelled" category

    Just like "undecided", there should also be "unlabelled" category

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. PROSPERO like reference number for citation

    It will be a good idea to link the search summary with may be a unique ID or hyperlink which can be mentioned in the final manuscript (Like there is a prospero reference number which can be quoted for protocol registration)

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Possibility to add comments

    Make it possible to add comments to the different References that you include or exclude.

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. making it easier to get to unscreened studies

    make it easier to toggle between the refs you have screened and those you have yet to screen. It's very unstable as it is. You have to screen in small batches.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Second step, include or exclude full text articles

    Sortering av fulltextartiklar efter relevans i ett nätsa steg efter sortering av abstracts

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Add numbers to articles

    Add numbers to the articles so that people can collaborate on parts of the review.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Counting number of conflicts

    A count of total number of cumulative conflicts (and between which reviewers) throughout the whole review process, even after the conflicts have been resolved.

    3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Fix issue where assigned inclusion/exclusion reasons and labels disappear off-screen

    Often I want to remove an exclusion or inclusion reason, or a label, but I'm unable to scroll down to the bottom of the list of reasons/labels. I see all the reasons/labels that I haven't assigned to a particular article, but ones I want to remove aren't accessible. This might occur more often when there are lots of reasons/labels - I don't remember.

    3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Select only those without specific labels

    Using keywords or labels to exclude (rather than include) abstracts when filtering

    6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Resolve duplicate option in mobile app

    It would be better if we have the option to resolve duplicates in mobile app

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7
  • Don't see your idea?

General

Feedback and Knowledge Base