Sortering av fulltextartiklar efter relevans i ett nätsa steg efter sortering av abstracts

Ipad and Android: would be very time saving if the next reference for screening would show immediately after selecting include or exclude, instead of having to scroll down.

It will be a good idea to link the search summary with may be a unique ID or hyperlink which can be mentioned in the final manuscript (Like there is a prospero reference number which can be quoted for protocol registration)

Load full list of titles and make it scrollable, do not refresh the list, this is quite annoying and causes me to loose track of the title list.

Improving the phone app so it does not have to download content after only a short amount of use would be useful. Or at least still being able to filter when this happens. Or maybe being able to sort in different ways.

Apologies if this function exists already but I have not found out how to do on the phone app

Make more than one "owner" on a review, or give all owner functions to additional collaborators, so that all settings and administration does not have to depend on the "owner". Particular helpful for example if the creator of the reviewer only works part-time, or needs help with finding specific settings.

I am in a Systematic Review workshop, and we are looking at Rayyan along with some other tools. A concern from several participants is what would happen if QCRI stopped supporting Rayyan or if it was bought by Elsevier, etc.

Making Rayyan an open source prioject would help allay some of these concerns. The QCRI team could also benefit from community input.

Extraction tool

Ability to rename, delete, and merge labels and exclusion reasons. Badly needed!

Just like "undecided", there should also be "unlabelled" category

blinding of author/institution/journal

I think it would be very useful if the keywords were not capital sensitive. Thank you

A count of total number of cumulative conflicts (and between which reviewers) throughout the whole review process, even after the conflicts have been resolved.

Automatisch verspringen naar het volgende artikel als iemand heet geïn- of excludeerd.

Make it possible to add comments to the different References that you include or exclude.

Logical rules to deal with inclusion / exclusion:
ie: A and B say include but C says don't -
allow to make A a higher priority member so that A plus B or C would be included but
B and C without A would still be a conflict

make it easier to toggle between the refs you have screened and those you have yet to screen. It's very unstable as it is. You have to screen in small batches.

Using keywords or labels to exclude (rather than include) abstracts when filtering

Often I want to remove an exclusion or inclusion reason, or a label, but I'm unable to scroll down to the bottom of the list of reasons/labels. I see all the reasons/labels that I haven't assigned to a particular article, but ones I want to remove aren't accessible. This might occur more often when there are lots of reasons/labels - I don't remember.

Being able to use AND when two or more labels are selected. Eg a reference must have both selected labels to be displayed. Currently all references that have either of these labels are displayed.