Quick scrolling option to get to the article you left off on during your last session.

Please add a feature to distinguish which reviewer provided which exclusion reason. This should also be stored in the export files like the decisions are stored for each reviewer.

As many times, this box causes unnecessary obstacles in using the interface to manage/ resolve duplicates, especially for new learners. It may be solved by making mobile like caller's image in skype.

Good if you can develop a facility to upload PDF full-texts direct from the source like the way EndNote and Mendeley do, Or
Good if you can develop a facility to upload references from EndNote/Mendeley along with the PDF full-texts when it is available with the citation.

Save side settings rather than default for each new review created

Searchby negation, for example for everything except included

Flowsheet (PRISMA-like)

Hi, to ideas from Sweden!
1.it would be very helpful if you would be able to underline text in the abstract.
2.
it would be great if you could make notes in connection with abstracts, as an example the number of patients included in a case series. It tends be too much different labels otherwise
Best regards,
AnnCatrin

Scroll option in the mobile app

Find Full Text function (like in EndNote)

FAQ frequently asked questions area on your website

Logical rules to deal with inclusion / exclusion:
ie: A and B say include but C says don't -
allow to make A a higher priority member so that A plus B or C would be included but
B and C without A would still be a conflict

be able to filter based on whether it was judged by only one individual or both.

Would be really useful if, when the option 'unsure' was checked, if it would display this decision similarly to the 'include' and 'exclude' then it would be clear to other reviewers that there is uncertainty over this reference rather than there being no decision shown which leads to uncertainty over whether this has been examined or not.

Add an indicator next to folders on left (e.g. keywords, duplicates etc) which shows percentage of papers resolved in that folder. This may also be achieved with a colour coded strip indicating red for incomplete and green for complete. This would then enable a reviewer to move on to other folders without going back and forth into folders already resolved.

Re-order exclusion reasons. This could be either manual, or dynamically by frequency or recency

Ex: be able to see all articles that don't contain the words "surgery", "surgeries", "surgeon", "surgeons", "surgical", etc.

It would be very helpful in excluding some articles.

It would be quicker to scan through abstracts if you highlight key parts of the abstract like "aims" or "results"...etc.

Provide better export data: Currently the export (RIS) does not include the year. The export should include all data fields that were available during import. Please - no deletion of data!