General

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  1. Be able to re-use inclusion/exlusion keywords which have previously been defined for a review.

    Re-use inclusion/exclusion keywords which were defined for a previous review (import/export inclusion/exclusion keywords).

    Explanation: I created an extensive set of inclusion/exclusion keywords for screening prediction studies. I would like to re-use them on a different review, without having to type them in again.

    6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  2. Full text search

    automatically search for full texts

    5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  3. To automatically jump to the last abstract that you've included

    When opening the app, let it automatically jump to the last abstract you've reviewed instead of scrolling down

    14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  4. Be able to search articles that DON'T contain some keywords.

    Ex: be able to see all articles that don't contain the words "surgery", "surgeries", "surgeon", "surgeons", "surgical", etc.

    It would be very helpful in excluding some articles.

    13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  5. Kappa

    Add Cohens Kappa

    8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  6. Backup and restore review file to and from local computer

    A feature to download a backup file of the running review to local computer, which contain all the decisions made till now and restore it if any thing goes wrong with the main online file. This will give extra piece of mind when reviewing a big list of documents (eg. more than a 1000 articles)

    20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  7. Have a 'Primary Researcher' override option for inclusion/exclusion decisions

    Most reviews will have a primary researcher that may review all title/abstract results, with collaborators doing a percentage for inclusion validity/reliability. It is likely there will be some conflict, and there needs to be a 'resolution' or 'override' function available to the primary researcher. These conflicting results still need to be resolved, but at the moment they are automatically excluded.

    41 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  8. Add link resolver

    Link resolver / OpenURL linking

    6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  9. Be able to edit title of your review!!

    Minimise orange tabs on bottom right!
    !

    11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  10. Add Comments

    Add comments section with the reviewer name

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  11. Keep record data intact

    Provide better export data: Currently the export (RIS) does not include the year. The export should include all data fields that were available during import. Please - no deletion of data!

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  12. Go invisible in the chat.

    Make it possible to go invisible in the chat.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  13. more options to file format when exporting

    export files in other formats than zip files

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  14. Ditch the pre-populated key words for include and exclude.

    The highlighted key words section is really useful, but different reviews will have different inclusion and exclusion criteria so the key words will be different. I just end up deleting them and adding my own, which just takes time. Great programme though.

    6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  15. Allow reordering of papers on the app

    I have divided a set of papers by authors for I and my colleagues to screen. But when I opened the app, they were no longer ordered by author alphabetically. Can you make ur possible to order them this way?

    5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  16. Store information about each imported file (source, query string etc)

    I'd like to keep information about the different searches behind each file that I import into Rayyan.

    Right now, Rayyan displays only the file name. It would be nice to have an information screen for each of those files. There you could write a database name, a search string, date of search etc.

    It would go some way towards making Rayyan more complete.

    Feature specification:

    User story: As a user, I would like to store and review information about each of the imported files in a review.

    Requirements:


    1. On the "review screen", e.g. https://rayyan.qcri.org/reviews/19984 , under "Search methods", when I…

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  17. Bulk-add keywords for include and exclude

    Bulk-add keywords for include and exclude and ditch the pre-populated keywords

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  18. Random allocation of references at start

    Enable radom allocation of references (until ratings are available) to avoid the problem of hasty generalization.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  19. Speeding up the selection

    Great software that makes systematic review easy.

    After hitting "I" or "E" to include or exclude a paper respectively, it would be good to have the selection move automatically onto the next paper.

    In the mobile app, it would be useful to just show the title and allow to include/exclude articles instead of seeing the abstract.

    31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  20. Ability to centrally define inclusion/exclusion reasons for all reviewers.

    Ability to pre-define consistent inclusion/exclusion reasons for all reviewers in a project, to be set by review owner.

    47 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
1 2 4 6 7 8
  • Don't see your idea?

General

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)