Re-use inclusion/exclusion keywords which were defined for a previous review (import/export inclusion/exclusion keywords).

Explanation: I created an extensive set of inclusion/exclusion keywords for screening prediction studies. I would like to re-use them on a different review, without having to type them in again.

Better export to csv for easier analysis. As it is right now, filtering is difficult because labels get lumped in with exclusion decisions, and there's lots of cleanup in excel. Just pipe those to different columns and we'd be golden.

automatically search for full texts

When opening the app, let it automatically jump to the last abstract you've reviewed instead of scrolling down

Ex: be able to see all articles that don't contain the words "surgery", "surgeries", "surgeon", "surgeons", "surgical", etc.

It would be very helpful in excluding some articles.

Add Cohens Kappa

Most reviews will have a primary researcher that may review all title/abstract results, with collaborators doing a percentage for inclusion validity/reliability. It is likely there will be some conflict, and there needs to be a 'resolution' or 'override' function available to the primary researcher. These conflicting results still need to be resolved, but at the moment they are automatically excluded.

Link resolver / OpenURL linking

Minimise orange tabs on bottom right!
!

A feature to download a backup file of the running review to local computer, which contain all the decisions made till now and restore it if any thing goes wrong with the main online file. This will give extra piece of mind when reviewing a big list of documents (eg. more than a 1000 articles)

Add comments section with the reviewer name

Provide better export data: Currently the export (RIS) does not include the year. The export should include all data fields that were available during import. Please - no deletion of data!

Make it possible to go invisible in the chat.

export files in other formats than zip files

The highlighted key words section is really useful, but different reviews will have different inclusion and exclusion criteria so the key words will be different. I just end up deleting them and adding my own, which just takes time. Great programme though.

I have divided a set of papers by authors for I and my colleagues to screen. But when I opened the app, they were no longer ordered by author alphabetically. Can you make ur possible to order them this way?

Bulk-add keywords for include and exclude and ditch the pre-populated keywords

Enable radom allocation of references (until ratings are available) to avoid the problem of hasty generalization.

Great software that makes systematic review easy.

After hitting "I" or "E" to include or exclude a paper respectively, it would be good to have the selection move automatically onto the next paper.

In the mobile app, it would be useful to just show the title and allow to include/exclude articles instead of seeing the abstract.