General
-
Clearly show 'undecided' selection
Would be really useful if, when the option 'unsure' was checked, if it would display this decision similarly to the 'include' and 'exclude' then it would be clear to other reviewers that there is uncertainty over this reference rather than there being no decision shown which leads to uncertainty over whether this has been examined or not.
9 votes -
Re-order exclusion reasons
Re-order exclusion reasons. This could be either manual, or dynamically by frequency or recency
1 vote -
Add year filter to app
Ability to set number of reviewers per article.
4 votes -
Go the distance! Make it possible to abstract data from a review and store it for meta-analysis.
Support abstraction
2 votes -
meta-analysis
meta analysis tool
3 votes -
Highlight key parts of the abstract (aims, methods...)
It would be quicker to scan through abstracts if you highlight key parts of the abstract like "aims" or "results"...etc.
9 votes -
Cleaner Export to CSV
Better export to csv for easier analysis. As it is right now, filtering is difficult because labels get lumped in with exclusion decisions, and there's lots of cleanup in excel. Just pipe those to different columns and we'd be golden.
35 votes -
Be able to re-use inclusion/exlusion keywords which have previously been defined for a review.
Re-use inclusion/exclusion keywords which were defined for a previous review (import/export inclusion/exclusion keywords).
Explanation: I created an extensive set of inclusion/exclusion keywords for screening prediction studies. I would like to re-use them on a different review, without having to type them in again.
7 votes -
Be able to edit title of your review!!
Minimise orange tabs on bottom right!
!18 votes -
Full text search
automatically search for full texts
6 votes -
Backup and restore review file to and from local computer
A feature to download a backup file of the running review to local computer, which contain all the decisions made till now and restore it if any thing goes wrong with the main online file. This will give extra piece of mind when reviewing a big list of documents (eg. more than a 1000 articles)
28 votes -
To automatically jump to the last abstract that you've included
When opening the app, let it automatically jump to the last abstract you've reviewed instead of scrolling down
14 votes -
Be able to search articles that DON'T contain some keywords.
Ex: be able to see all articles that don't contain the words "surgery", "surgeries", "surgeon", "surgeons", "surgical", etc.
It would be very helpful in excluding some articles.
13 votes -
Kappa
Add Cohens Kappa
8 votes -
Have a 'Primary Researcher' override option for inclusion/exclusion decisions
Most reviews will have a primary researcher that may review all title/abstract results, with collaborators doing a percentage for inclusion validity/reliability. It is likely there will be some conflict, and there needs to be a 'resolution' or 'override' function available to the primary researcher. These conflicting results still need to be resolved, but at the moment they are automatically excluded.
47 votes -
Add link resolver
Link resolver / OpenURL linking
6 votes -
Add Comments
Add comments section with the reviewer name
1 vote -
more options to file format when exporting
export files in other formats than zip files
5 votesPlease be more specific on the formats you want to be added.
-
Keep record data intact
Provide better export data: Currently the export (RIS) does not include the year. The export should include all data fields that were available during import. Please - no deletion of data!
2 votes -
Go invisible in the chat.
Make it possible to go invisible in the chat.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?